[-] Question 6 changed?
by natanavr - Thursday, 30 June 2016 00:23:41
Was question 6 changed?

I remember very well that 6.a was "CALL CX", which gave me a segmentation fault. 6.e was "JC CX"...

Not Intending to offend or anything, but weren't we supposed to be notified about such changes?
If I haven't decide to review my work I wouldn't know about those changes.
[-] Re: Question 6 changed?
by shimony - Thursday, 30 June 2016 11:52:09
Yes, I changed it.
You can submit according to either the old or the new version.

Re: Question 6 changed?
by natanavr - Thursday, 30 June 2016 13:46:46
Thanks.
[-] Re: Question 6 changed?
by rihnshty - Thursday, 30 June 2016 17:12:04
according to change, since we are now calling ECX, should we assume every bit in ECX prior to CX is 0? otherwise there is no way knowing what will be pushed to the stack after the first line
Re: Question 6 changed?
by sadetsky - Friday, 1 July 2016 21:56:36
sure