| Authors | Q | Grade |
|---|
| 066197781,043397561 | Q1 | Good |
- Nice report, ordered and readable
- I cannot understand why you got poor results. Your 2nd fitness function looks pretty good. Maybe there is a bug in your code? Too bad you did not have time to fix it
- Interesting conclusions
|
| 040600314 | Q1 | Excellent |
- Very interesting report
- Very interesting discussion and process of work
- Interesting conclusions
- Nice trick with the first and last rules
- +2 points bonus on excellent report
|
| 034077636 | Q1 | Excellent |
- Very interesting report
- Discussion and conclusions capture your work nicely
- Nice diagrams (how do you do that in Excel?) and graphs
- +3 points bonus on excellent report
|
| 043557214,043246495 | Q1 | Excellent |
- Very good report
- Like the monkey picture :-)
- Very nice extra work, and good job changing to a harder problem, Density, to show the improvements in action.
- "Non Symmetrical Connections" does seem like a natural extension, great to see you get better reaults.
- "Double moral" is also a nice extension, but you do not explain at what times the Boolean is flipped. From looking at your I understand that it is flipped every 3 "generations", and wonder if I would have expected the improvement in results. Anyway, good job!
- Interesting conclusions
- +6 points bonus for extra work and great reprot
|
| 061997292,309190585 | Q1 | Very Good |
- Nice report
- Good parameters description
- Missing a but of discussion and conclusions
|
| 060643665,053084489 | Q1 | Very Good_Minus |
- Overall good report, but poor results
- The syncronization problem should not be too hard to solve. Maybe you had a bug in your code, or needed some more experimenting with the fitness function
- Missing some more conclusions
|
| 040144594 | Q1 | Excellent |
- Very interesting report
- Nice idea of distance evolution. I wonder if the results would have been different without it.
- Nice conclusions
|
| 036155679,061109013 | Q1 | Excellent |
- Original fitness funciton, though the convergence to a good CA seems relatively slower
- Nice touch with graphically showing how evolution grew better CA's
- Altogether very interesting report
|
| 040296535,040680993 | Q1 | Excellent |
- Nice detailed report
- Interesting discussion and conclusions
|
| 060403144,060414562 | Q1 | Excellent |
- Very nice, ordered, readable report
- Very interesting discussion and process of work
- Interesting conclusions
- Nice rug
- +2 point bonus on great report
|
| 011950466,040210148 | Q1 | Excellent |
- Very nice, readable report
- Very interesting discussion and process of work
- Very interesting conclusions
- Mutation in each configuration, means mutating at a low probability each configuration. Glad you found that out empirically
- Great you showed and analyzed also the rule-code distribution between the cells
- +3 points bonus on excellent report
|
| 066096520,040952061 | Q1 | Very Good_Plus |
- Interesting, good report
- Nice touch with graphically showing how evolution grew better CA's
- A bit confusing to use the term "generation", once for 300 and conce for 1500 configurations
- Good conclusions
|
| 304606536,312817927 | Q1 | Very Good |
- Interesting, good report
- Nice to see the "evolution" of fitness function in your work
- Missing some discussion and conclusions
- Small note: the evolution on the rules is done every K iterations, not every C mod K.
|
| 037770039 | Q1 | Very Good_Plus |
- Interesting, good report
- Nice 3D graphs, missing some explanations - what are S1, S2, "Generations"?
- Missing some discussion and conclusions
|
| 304369283 | Q1 | Excellent |
- Very interesting report
- Nice graphs and histograms
- Interesting conclusions
- Great you showed and analyzed also the rule-code distribution between the cells
|